On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 12:07:48 Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Paul Eggleton > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:28:59 Alexander Kanavin wrote: > >> On 12/15/2015 05:25 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> >> +COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86|x86_64|mips|powerpc|powerpc64).*-linux' > >> >> +COMPATIBLE_HOST_armv7a = 'arm.*-linux' > >> > > >> > Can you add armv7ve as well? > >> > >> Armv7ve support is not yet in master, so you'll have to add it later I'm > >> afraid. > > > > I think by policy we don't have any restrictions on architecture-specific > > flags in OE-Core (at least, assuming they're reasonable). > > If we're going to duplicate all _armv7a over-rides for _armv7ve then > I'd vote to do so in a single patch series which fixes up the whole of > oe-core rather than adding the over-rides one at a time amongst > version updates etc.
Makes sense, but before doing that would it make sense to have a grouping override for all of them that can be used instead (where appropriate)? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
