On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:31:19 +0000 "Burton, Ross" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5 January 2016 at 14:22, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes and also if there are no x11 dependencies in this packagegroup, > > then it should be renamed to packagegroup-core-sato. > > > > I'll resubmit. Thank you. > > > > Don't - sato is explicitly X11 based. I'm thinking that all recipes included in the sato image define REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES = "x11" themselves, like matchbox-desktop does, so there's no need to define it again in the packagegroup recipe, since no package actually requires it there. I thought the same rationale also applies to the packagegroup names. However now I understand the need to propagate the indirect x11 dependency in the names. So I'll just remove the features check as per Martin's suggestion and leave the name as it is. > > Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
