* in all cases we currently have we consider armv7ve to be compatible with 
armv7a

Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]>
---
 meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7ve.inc | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7ve.inc 
b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7ve.inc
index 79e1ef6..d0fdff7 100644
--- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7ve.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7ve.inc
@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ DEFAULTTUNE ?= "armv7ve"
 TUNEVALID[armv7ve] = "Enable instructions for ARMv7ve"
 TUNECONFLICTS[armv7ve] = "armv4 armv5 armv6 armv7 armv7a"
 TUNE_CCARGS .= "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv7ve', ' 
-march=armv7ve', '', d)}"
-MACHINEOVERRIDES =. "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv7ve', 
'armv7ve:', '' ,d)}"
+# In all cases we currently have we consider armv7ve to be compatible with 
armv7a
+MACHINEOVERRIDES =. "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv7ve', 
'armv7ve:armv7a:', '' ,d)}"
 
 require conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv6.inc
 require conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-neon.inc
-- 
2.7.0

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to