On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 04:39:53 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: >> > On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 01:04:31 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: >> >> > Upgrade U-Boot to latest version and drop upstreamed patches. >> >> > >> >> > Repair configuration of U-Boot during build. It is no longer >> >> > possible to run "make foomachine" in U-Boot. Instead, it is >> >> > necessary to do "make foomachine_defconfig ; make". Fix this >> >> > in u-boot.inc and u-boot-fw-utils*.bb . >> >> >> >> Please drop this config suffix, from u-boot.inc. The config value >> >> should be used as is and the respective BSP ought to be fixed to >> >> change _config to _defconfig. >> > >> > If I don't have the _defconfig there AND I define UBOOT_MACHINE in my >> > machine file, it will call "make machine", which no longer works. >> >> I know and the right fix is to use the right value to UBOOT_MACHINE as >> we do for KERNEL_DEVICETREE. > > So what is the right value ? UBOOT_MACHINE := "foo_defconfig" ? This does > not sound right at all. > > And what is the right value of UBOOT_CONFIG then ?
foo_defconfig. This is what we pass for make to configure the board and should be the given value. As we does for device tree, where we pass for KERNEL_DEVICETREE: foo-bar.dtb and this is also given for the make, for the kernel. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core