On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 16:47 +0000, Christopher Larson wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:45 AM Richard Purdie < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Also clean up use of immediate expansion as there are cleaner > > mechanisms now. > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/ed/ed_0.5.bb b/meta/recipes > > -extended/ed/ed_0.5.bb > > index 143e636..e2df13f 100644 > > --- a/meta/recipes-extended/ed/ed_0.5.bb > > +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/ed/ed_0.5.bb > > @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ inherit autotools texinfo > > > > EXTRA_OECONF = "'CC=${CC}' 'CXX=${CXX}' 'CFLAGS=${CFLAGS}' > > 'CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS}' 'CPPFLAGS=${CPPFLAGS}' 'LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS}'" > > > > -CONFIGUREOPTS := "${@d.getVar('CONFIGUREOPTS', True).replace('- > > -disable-dependency-tracking', ' ')}" > > -CONFIGUREOPTS := "${@d.getVar('CONFIGUREOPTS', True).replace('- > > -disable-silent-rules', ' ')}" > > - > > - > > +CONFIGUREOPTS_remove = "--disable-dependency-tracking" > > +CONFIGUREOPTS_remove = "--disable-silent-rules" > > +EXTRA_OECONF_remove = "--disable-static" > This will be impossible to undo in a bbappend..
I appreciate that and we've talked about ways we likely need to extend the API for that. In this case, I would ask why would anyone want/need to add in a configure option which configure doesn't support? I guess someone could patch it, however if they do that, the could also pick a different option name. Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
