On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 15:53 +0800, Zhou, Li wrote: > Please refer to Peter Seebach's patch earlier: > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-Januar > y/115472.html > My patch should be based on that. > I think the change is not only for canadian build. Thanks. > > On 03/01/2016 02:12 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Li Zhou <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Add TUNE_CCARGS for CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET of gcc-cross-canadian to > > > solve > > > below errors when compiling gcc-cross-canadian-powerpc64 within a > > > debug > > > build: > > > > > > configure:3655: checking for suffix of object files > > > configure:3677: powerpc64-wrs-linux-gcc - > > > -sysroot=......bitbake_build/ > > > tmp/sysroots/fsl-t2xxx -isystem=/usr/include --sysroot=....../ > > > bitbake_build/tmp/sysroots/fsl-t2xxx -c -O0 -fno-omit-frame > > > -pointer -g > > > -pipe -g -Os conftest.c >&5 > > > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > > > {standard input}:23: Error: register save offset not a multiple > > > of 8 > > > {standard input}:24: Error: register save offset not a multiple > > > of 8 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Li Zhou <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian.inc | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian.inc > > > b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian.inc > > > index ec1d281..04ae981 100644 > > > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian.inc > > > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian.inc > > > @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ do_configure () { > > > export CPPFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_CPPFLAGS}" > > > export CXXFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_CXXFLAGS}" > > > export LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_LDFLAGS}" > > > - export CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_CFLAGS}" > > > + export CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_CFLAGS} > > > ${TUNE_CCARGS}" > > Will this cause canadian builds to become too specific instead of > > generic common arch
I agree with Khem, I think there are potential problems this introduces. Did you try running the selftests for sstate sigs with this change? I suspect it breaks :( Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
