On 03/12/16 16:54, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 12 March 2016 at 04:28, Trevor Woerner <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:openembedded-core/meta = master:00d3fd571a8d261d065b43f5cf3076a381843984 meta-openembedded/meta-oe = master:a1e135a499998add7575682bf53db5e02e753580 meta-openembedded/meta-gnome = master:a1e135a499998add7575682bf53db5e02e753580 meta-rpb = master:203903ca6f4e8df09bef6ea3c6e899d07eca8df9 meta-96boards = master:2be59f0d381b5ec173d7fc24f3ae14aaf47b8649 meta-qcom = master:32fcda819acb8ec485d9ab05108d554f807bf75d meta-browser = master:a3789a4168fcd42f1cdf5b5febe2c779a9467919 meta-linaro/meta-linaro-toolchain = master:367f784b831938dc508b7d472342d2d0d6ed9769 meta-poky/meta = master:37b61b059031e3c272a929b834e12fd83f46598c meta-poky/meta-poky = master:37b61b059031e3c272a929b834e12fd83f46598cWhy are you pulling oe-core/meta and poky/meta into the same build considering they're literally the same layer? You should either drop oe-core/meta or poky/meta from your bblayers.
Ok, thanks; good point.
However the output showing the full remote URLs seems a sensible improvement to me.
My hesitation is whether we want to replace the existing buildhistory/metadata-revs with my "improvements" or whether I should just create a second file with the updates. I don't want to break anyone's process should they have come to rely on that file being as it is.
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
