On 22 March 2016 at 14:49, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu <[email protected]> wrote:
> util-linux, sysvinit, and busybox are all capable of providing > mountpoint; add a VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_mountpoint in order to switch > runtime dependencies between the three at build time. > Is there a good reason to use util-linux's mountpoint over busybox by default? If busybox can do it already then we can save a bit of space. Ross
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
