On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 21:17 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 23 March 2016 at 18:03, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Or alternatively, add an extra check so that when it thinks it's found a > > misplaced library, it checks the ELF header to make sure that it really is > > one and suppresses the diagnostic if not. If you only do this in cases > > where it was about to print a warning anyway then the impact on performance > > shouldn't be too bad. > > > Yeah, best of both worlds. A flexible regex to catch potential offenders, and > then use oe.qa.ELFFile to verify it's actually a library. Can you update the > patch Bill? > Yes, I'll update the patch and repost in a bit.
-Bill -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
