On 7/18/16 6:27 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Jul 18, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Bruce Ashfield <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Phil Blundell <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 2016-07-18 at 23:01 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >> >> > Now that musl is fairly mature I think it's time to take uclibc out to >> > pasture, where the pasture is possibly called meta-uclibc. >> >> I think this is a splendid idea. >> >> >> Agreed. >> >> But do we need a sharpened stake to make sure it doesn't come back ? > > I think its just about time. Given the health of uclibc project and > maintenance > burden we impose on OE-Core, if someone > needs to have it beyond 2.1, please step up and we can create a new layer > mnta-uclibc and it can be hosted there. but it > certainly should go out of OE-Core.
Agreed. --Mark >> >> Bruce >> >> >> >> p. >> >> >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> >> >> >> >> -- >> "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at >> its end" >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
