On 01.08.2016 16:06, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Simon Fels <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > I've worked on a new layer recently which brings snaps to any > Yocto/OpenEmbedded based system. > > If you have never heard about snaps yet you will find most details at > http://snapcraft.io/ but generally snaps are a new packaging format made > with security and fast updates in mind and allows applications to be > packaged once but run everywhere no matter of the distribution used or a > particular device type. > > The layer is currently named meta-snappy and is available at > https://github.com/morphis/meta-snappy > > > I had a quick browse this morning, and one question that jumped to mind was > if the oe-meta-go layer was causing problems for go/go-cross support ? I was > carrying some go/go-inc changes in meta-virtualization as well, but recent > reports > are that oe-meta-go should work for everything now. > > I'm just asking, since it doesn't make sense for meta-virt or other layers to > continue to carry go build infrastructure when it could be unified. When I started to put meta-snappy together I ran into different problems with oe-meta-go and then reused what you put into meta-virt. I have the point on my TODO list to check if we can just switch to oe-meta-go rather than shipping go-cross on our own.
regards, Simon -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
