* Mark Hatle <[email protected]> [160810 22:18]: > On 8/10/16 2:12 PM, Davis, Michael wrote: > > GPLV3 and BSD portions were originally placed in the same package. > > The GPLv3 portion has been seperated into pcsc-lite-spy so the package can > > be used with GPLv3 blacklisted.
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Davis <[email protected]> > > --- > > meta-oe/recipes-support/pcsc-lite/pcsc-lite_1.8.13.bb | 11 +++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/pcsc-lite/pcsc-lite_1.8.13.bb > > b/meta-oe/recipes-support/pcsc-lite/pcsc-lite_1.8.13.bb > > index cc72549..e1d405b 100644 > > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-support/pcsc-lite/pcsc-lite_1.8.13.bb > > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-support/pcsc-lite/pcsc-lite_1.8.13.bb > > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ > > SUMMARY = "PC/SC Lite smart card framework and applications" > > HOMEPAGE = "http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/"; > > -LICENSE = "BSD & GPLv3+" > > +LICENSE = "BSD" > LICENSE should be the overall license(s) of the sources used to produce the > binaries. > So in this case you'd want to do: > LICENSE = "BSD & GPLv3+" > LICENSE_${PN} = "BSD" > LICENSE_${PN}-lib = "BSD" > ... > LICENSE_${PN}-spy = "GPLv3+" > LICENSE_${PN}-dev = "GPLv3+" Shouldn't the ${PN}-dev package have the combined license? Cheers, Anders -- Anders Darander, Senior System Architect ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
