> On Aug 11, 2016, at 1:38 AM, Andre McCurdy <[email protected]> wrote: > > Removing the ccache directory as part of do_clean is unnecessarily > conservative and defeats many of the benefits of ccache. > > The original justification for this behaviour was to avoid confusion > in the corner case that the ccache directory becomes corrupted. > However the standard approach for dealing with such highly unlikely > corner cases (ie manually removing tmp) would also recover from > corruption of the ccache directories, without the negative impact of > defeating ccache during normal development.
perhaps a good know-how on this if someone runs into this case would justify this patch. Since this can still break the case where someone is doing -cclean* operations and other tasks are run individually for such broken case. > > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <[email protected]> > --- > meta/classes/ccache.bbclass | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/classes/ccache.bbclass b/meta/classes/ccache.bbclass > index 2cdce46..2e9837c 100644 > --- a/meta/classes/ccache.bbclass > +++ b/meta/classes/ccache.bbclass > @@ -4,5 +4,3 @@ CCACHE_DISABLE[unexport] = "1" > > do_configure[dirs] =+ "${CCACHE_DIR}" > do_kernel_configme[dirs] =+ "${CCACHE_DIR}" > - > -do_clean[cleandirs] += "${CCACHE_DIR}" > -- > 1.9.1 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
