* validate_pn() is supposed to protect against invalid characters, fix
  the function so that it actually does (unanchored regex strikes
  again...)
* However, now that the function is enforcing the restrictions, we do
  still want to allow + in recipe names (e.g. "gtk+")

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com>
---
 meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py b/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py
index a0d78dd..58e4028 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py
@@ -449,8 +449,8 @@ def get_recipe_patched_files(d):
 def validate_pn(pn):
     """Perform validation on a recipe name (PN) for a new recipe."""
     reserved_names = ['forcevariable', 'append', 'prepend', 'remove']
-    if not re.match('[0-9a-z-.]+', pn):
-        return 'Recipe name "%s" is invalid: only characters 0-9, a-z, - and . 
are allowed' % pn
+    if not re.match('^[0-9a-z-.+]+$', pn):
+        return 'Recipe name "%s" is invalid: only characters 0-9, a-z, -, + 
and . are allowed' % pn
     elif pn in reserved_names:
         return 'Recipe name "%s" is invalid: is a reserved keyword' % pn
     elif pn.startswith('pn-'):
-- 
2.5.5

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to