On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Cal Sullivan <
california.l.sulli...@intel.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 09/19/2016 03:55 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Cal Sullivan <
> california.l.sulli...@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't have time to smoke test a SRCREV update for so many machines
>> right now, so I think for now I will just set the correct PV in the various
>> linux-yocto recipes so we don't block master-next builds.
>>
>> Is this acceptable?
>>
>
> In the linux-yocto bbappends of the various layers ? I keep track of the
> PV's in the
> core recipes themselves, so they shouldn't need to be modified.
>
> You're right. Only the linux-yocto bbappends in meta-yocto-bsp need
> MACHINE-specific PVs right now.
> The issue with 4.1 (used by lsb right now) in oe-core is that
> LINUX_VERSION was bumped to 4.1.32 rather than 4.1.31 in error.
>

I'll take care of that part in a few hours. Since I've been testing the
SRCREVs, I'll double
check and tweak it as need be.

Bruce


>
> ---
> Cal
>
>
>
> Bruce
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cal
>>
>>
>> On 09/19/2016 01:49 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 15:55 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2016-09-19 03:53 PM, Cal Sullivan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yep, these all have incorrect PVs.
>>>>> 628bf62756 Merge tag 'v4.4.11' into standard/base
>>>>> The problem seems fairly wide spread.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce, do you suggest updating PVs or updating the SRCREVs (is
>>>>> there a
>>>>> good reason to keep using old SRCREVs?)?
>>>>>
>>>> Updating the SRCREVs is the right thing to do to sync them up now.
>>>>
>>>> but ..
>>>>
>>>> at the same time, they should probably have their own PVs, since
>>>> next time up update 4.4.x, they'll fall out of sync and fail again.
>>>>
>>>> +1, I think that these need their own PV since they also don't update
>>> as fast as the base qemu recipes do.
>>>
>>> Sau!
>>>
>>> We want them to be aligned with the latest -stable, but we also
>>>> don't need failures every time I push a new SRCREV and update the
>>>> PV of the base recipe.
>>>>
>>>> Bruce
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Cal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/19/2016 11:54 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 19 September 2016 at 18:05, Cal Sullivan
>>>>>> <california.l.sulli...@intel.com
>>>>>> <mailto:california.l.sulli...@intel.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      It looks like the function is doing as its supposed to, and
>>>>>> we
>>>>>>      need to update some PVs or SRCREVs to match PVs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      E.g., on the error below, SRCREV d6237b3b24 is indeed 4.1.31.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And some more builders failed with 4.4:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ERROR: linux-yocto-4.4.20+gitAUTOINC+e66032e2d9_628bf62756-r0
>>>>>> do_kernel_version_sanity_check: Package Version
>>>>>> (4.4.20+gitAUTOINC+e66032e2d9_628bf62756) does not match of
>>>>>> kernel
>>>>>> being built (4.4.11). Please update the PV variable to match the
>>>>>> kernel source.
>>>>>> ERROR: linux-yocto-4.4.20+gitAUTOINC+e66032e2d9_628bf62756-r0
>>>>>> do_kernel_version_sanity_check: Function failed:
>>>>>> do_kernel_version_sanity_check (log file is located at
>>>>>> /home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-
>>>>>> arm/build/build/tmp/work/beaglebone-poky-linux-gnueabi/linux-
>>>>>> yocto/4.4.20+gitAUTOINC+e66032e2d9_628bf62756-
>>>>>> r0/temp/log.do_kernel_version_sanity_check.30210)
>>>>>> NOTE: recipe usbutils-008-r0: task do_fetch: Started
>>>>>> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in:
>>>>>> /home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-
>>>>>> arm/build/build/tmp/work/beaglebone-poky-linux-gnueabi/linux-
>>>>>> yocto/4.4.20+gitAUTOINC+e66032e2d9_628bf62756-
>>>>>> r0/temp/log.do_kernel_version_sanity_check.30210
>>>>>> ERROR: Task
>>>>>> (/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-
>>>>>> arm/build/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-
>>>>>> yocto_4.4.bb:do_kernel_version_sanity_check)
>>>>>> failed with exit code '1'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (ditto for ppc and x86)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ross
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee
> at its end"
>
>
>


-- 
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee
at its end"
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to