On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 16:51 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > Hello Markus, > > On 05.10.2016 16:11, Markus Lehtonen wrote: > > Check that the init script that is going to be called in the prerm() > > script really exists. There might be a packaging bug or the script > > might've been removed already earlier in prerm(). > > isn't it called prerm in the first place because it's not supposed to > remove any packaged files?
In the case of this bug it does not remove any packaged files. Update -alternatives removes a symlink (created by itself) > And if there's a packaging bug, we should IMO better add a sanity check > there and abort the build. First of all, this does not fix a build-time, but a run-time problem. And, I think that the pre post etc scripts should basically never fail. [YOCTO #10299] > > > > Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <[email protected]> > > --- > > meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass b/meta/classes/update > > -rc.d.bbclass > > index dfef2a2..24da547 100644 > > --- a/meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass > > +++ b/meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass > > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ fi > > } > > > > updatercd_prerm() { > > -if [ -z "$D" ]; then > > +if [ -z "$D" -a -f "${INIT_D_DIR}/${INITSCRIPT_NAME}" ]; then > > ${INIT_D_DIR}/${INITSCRIPT_NAME} stop > > fi > > } > > > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
