On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Paul Eggleton
> Hi Ulf,
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:30:27 Ulf Magnusson wrote:
>> Only PE and PV were shown, which might have been an oversight. The
>> tuples passed to version_str() contain three elements (PE, PV, and PR),
>> not two.
> I have to say I don't recall exactly but I think it was deliberate. We're
> talking about the recipe side here - is knowing the PR value actually useful?
> It's not like you can identify the recipe in any meaningful way by the PR
It's helpful when mapping recipes to packages at least.
Waxing philosophical, maybe PR could be viewed as a "recipe revision"
with PKGR being the "package revision", in the same sense as for
PE/PKGE and PV/PKGV. That's just an excuse I made up just now though.
I intuitively expected PR to be in there.
Openembedded-core mailing list