On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:33:22 Jiajie Hu wrote: > On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 07:01:30 AM Paul Eggleton wrote: > > So this in itself looks reasonable in theory, but I have to warn you that > > when we switch to tinfoil2 [1] these commits are going to be done via the > > metadata instead, and beyond a possible hack that I'd really rather not > > think about it's going to be a bit difficult to intercept the > > prefuncs/postfuncs there. At least they will be executed though since with > > tinfoil2 we'll be going through a much more standard path to run the > > tasks. > > > > [1] https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Tinfoil2 > > Glad to know that my fix can be superseded by tinfoil2 APIs. Do you have any > estimation when the switch will happen?
The target is 2.3 milestone 1, which is in December. However there are still a lot of things to be fixed as I've noted on the wiki page I linked. Thinking about it though it's possible I could split out this particular change and get it sent earlier - in fact that may be a good idea anyway. I'll look into that. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
