On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy <v...@mleia.com> wrote: > Hello Khem, > > On 12/09/2016 03:29 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >> >>> On Dec 6, 2016, at 7:17 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy <v...@mleia.com> wrote: >>> >>> This change allows to pass QA for packages built with sh4-oe-linux-musl >>> toolchain, the problem is reproted while building core-image-minimal target: >>> >>> ERROR: readline-7.0-r0 do_package_qa: >>> Error executing a python function in exec_python_func() autogenerated >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <v...@mleia.com> >>> --- >>> meta/classes/insane.bbclass | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass >>> index 5ddb87b..01494e3 100644 >>> --- a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass >>> +++ b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass >>> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ def package_qa_get_machine_dict(d): >>> "microblaze": (189, 0, 0, False, >>> 32), >>> "microblazeeb":(189, 0, 0, False, >>> 32), >>> "microblazeel":(189, 0, 0, True, >>> 32), >>> + "sh4": ( 42, 0, 0, True, >>> 32), >> >> Can you also add sh4eb as well while you are at it ? >> > > I don't build or do runtime testing of sh4eb, and you may notice that > there is no any other sh4eb target in the file at the moment. I'll try > to find some time in the future and test sh4eb linux, linux-musl and > linux-uclibc toolchains and add all of them together as a distinct > change. > > Since missing sh4 linux-musl hits me immediately, I would like to ask > you to apply the change as is. >
OK, I think thats fine, I was hoping that you were testing that too > Thank you. > > -- > With best wishes, > Vladimir -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core