When building systemd with multilib support enabled in your build you will get the following QA warnings (if the 'libdir' QA check is enabled.)
WARNING: systemd-1_232-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: systemd-dbg: found \ library in wrong location: /lib/systemd/.debug/libsystemd-shared-232.so systemd: found library in wrong location: /lib/systemd/libsystemd-shared.so systemd: found library in wrong location: /lib/systemd/libsystemd-shared-232.so [libdir] Since systemd 231 upstream has included an 'internal' library which they explicitly place in the application specific /lib/systemd directory. You can see some of the discussion about this placement here https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3810 This placement is being picked up by the QA checker since when multilibs are enabled it expects all libraries to be in lib32 or lib64. Since the systemd and systemd-dbg packages don't contain any other libraries we can respect the upstream placement and skip this QA check for these packages. Unfortunately the QA mechanism doesn't allow us to specify individual files so this approach is the best we can do. Signed-off-by: Mark Asselstine <[email protected]> --- meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_232.bb | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_232.bb b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_232.bb index baee02e..c86badb 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_232.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_232.bb @@ -485,7 +485,8 @@ RRECOMMENDS_${PN} += "${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'serial-getty-genera os-release \ " -INSANE_SKIP_${PN} += "dev-so" +INSANE_SKIP_${PN} += "dev-so libdir" +INSANE_SKIP_${PN}-dbg += "libdir" INSANE_SKIP_${PN}-doc += " libdir" PACKAGES =+ "udev udev-hwdb" -- 2.7.4 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
