On 21 December 2016 at 08:19, <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Mingli Yu <[email protected]> > > * src/gpgme.h.in (GPGME_STATUS_KEY_CONSIDERED): New. > * src/status-table.c (KEY_CONSIDERED): New. > * src/op-support.c (_gpgme_parse_inv_recp): Add argc KC_FPR and > KC_FLAGS. Use calloc. > (_gpgme_parse_key_considered): New. > * src/sign.c (op_data_t): Add fields KC_FPR and KC_FLAGS. > (release_op_data): Free KC_FPR. > (_gpgme_sign_status_handler): Handle STATUS_KEY_CONSIDERED. > * src/encrypt.c (op_data_t): Add fields KC_FPR and KC_FLAGS. > (release_op_data): Free KC_FPR. > (_gpgme_encrypt_status_handler): Handle STATUS_KEY_CONSIDERED. > > Reference: https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gpgme.git;a= > commitdiff;h=315fb73d4a774e2c699ac1804f5377559b4d0027 >
Can you explain *why* we should cherry pick a patch from upstream? Ross
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
