> On Dec 22, 2016, at 2:25 AM, Nicolas Dechesne <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> >> --- >> ...1-mssdemux-improved-live-playback-support.patch | 929 >> +++++++++++++++++++++ >> ...ming-implement-adaptivedemux-s-get_live_s.patch | 183 ++++ >> ...ming-use-the-duration-from-the-list-of-fr.patch | 62 ++ >> .../gstreamer/gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad_1.10.2.bb | 3 + >> 4 files changed, 1177 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 >> meta/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad/0001-mssdemux-improved-live-playback-support.patch >> create mode 100644 >> meta/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad/0001-smoothstreaming-implement-adaptivedemux-s-get_live_s.patch >> create mode 100644 >> meta/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad/0001-smoothstreaming-use-the-duration-from-the-list-of-fr.patch >> > > Do we really want to do that? Backporting in stable branch looks right > to me, but backporting to master while we know that we will get gst > 1.12 on time for the next release anyways, doesn't sound great to me. > maybe we should get these patches merged in 1.10.x instead of carrying > them ourselves?
Thats a good idea, if we have 1.12 coming in time for 2.3 release then I would not worry about it so much. however back-porting is certainly a good option but it should be carried out independently of OE work. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
