Hi Jussi

The remaining patch are still useful, I just rebase those patchs on version 74.p1. I will explain it.

Thanks.


On 2017年01月19日 20:32, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:


On 19 January 2017 at 13:52, Burton, Ross <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    You're removing this patch:

    On 19 January 2017 at 09:50, Dengke Du <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        ---
        
a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssh/openssh/add-test-support-for-busybox.patch
        +++ /dev/null
        @@ -1,69 +0,0 @@
        -Adjust test cases to work with busybox.
        -
        -- Replace dd parameter "obs" with "bs".
        -- Replace "head -<num>" with "head -n <num>".
        -
        -Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        -Upstream-Status: Pending
        -
        -Index: openssh-6.8p1/regress/cipher-speed.sh
        -===================================================================
        ---- openssh-6.8p1.orig/regress/cipher-speed.sh
        -+++ openssh-6.8p1/regress/cipher-speed.sh
        -@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ for c in `${SSH} -Q cipher`; do n=0; for
        -               printf "%-60s" "$c/$m:"
        -               ( ${SSH} -o 'compression no' \
        -                       -F $OBJ/ssh_proxy -2 -m $m -c $c
        somehost \
        --                      exec sh -c \'"dd of=/dev/null obs=32k"\' \
        -+                      exec sh -c \'"dd of=/dev/null bs=32k"\' \


    But upstream still has exec sh -c \'"dd of=/dev/null obs=32k"\',
    so this patch is still needed.

    Please always explain why patches are being removed in the commit
    message.


There's also lots of changes to the remaining patches. Some of them look weird -- possibly they're just whitespace changes? Please mention what the patch changes are in the commit message.

Jussi

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to