On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 13:53 +0000, Patchwork wrote: > * Issue A patch file has been added, but does not have a > Signed-off-by tag [test_signed_off_by_presence] > Suggested fix Sign off the added patch file > (meta/recipes-extended/acpica/acpitests/aapits-linux.patch) > > * Issue Added patch file is missing Upstream-Status in the header > [test_upstream_status_presence] > Suggested fix Add Upstream-Status: <status> to the header of > meta/recipes-extended/acpica/acpitests/aapits-linux.patch (possible values: > Pending, Submitted, Accepted, Backport, Denied, Inappropriate)
This is intentional: I'm not the original author and didn't want to mess too much with the recipe. Should I add Upstream-Status in a separate commit? > * Issue Series does not apply on top of target branch > [test_series_merge_on_head] > Suggested fix Rebase your series on top of targeted branch > Targeted branch master (currently at ce5c7075d5) Argh, apparently I only meant to rebase and then didn't. Will resolve this and send V4. But it's good that patchtest is finding this promptly, kudos! -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
