On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 11:00 +0000, Andrew Goodbody wrote: > > > > From: Richard Purdie [mailto:[email protected]] > > On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 09:56 +0000, Andrew Goodbody wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Richard Purdie [mailto:[email protected] > > > > ] > > > > On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 18:08 +0000, Andrew Goodbody wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks but unfortunately that did not work for me. > > > > > > > > > > I did a cleanall on glibc before trying to build it, but the > > > > > result > > > > > was the same. > > > > Try a "bitbake glibc-initial -c clean"? > > > Sorry, it was glibc-initial that I ran the cleanall on, so just > > > clean > > > makes no difference. > > Ok, what does bitbake -e show as the value of PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS? > > > > You could try putting something like: > > > > bb.warn(d.expand("${SSTATE_MANIFESTS}/manifest-%s- > > *.populate_sysroot" % pkgarch)) > > > > into that 'for pkgarch in pkgarchs' loop and see what its looking > > for. > > There is some detail I'm missing with the problem right now... :/ > And the detail is that that bit of code is not called in this > situation. I think it is only used when no dependencies are declared. > The attached patch fixes it for me.
Sorry, yes, you're totally right. I hadn't remembered there were two places we were making this assumption! That does look like the right fix although I might rework that code slightly. Thanks! Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
