This is admitted a bit of a hack but it does allow a number of significant sdk tests to run successfully and hence improves testing of eSDK which is good.
I'm therefore proposing we do this until we come up with a better solution since the current lack of testing is worrying and would have caught other issues had it been present. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> --- meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/context.py | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/context.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/context.py index bee8c39..65da4c6 100644 --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/context.py +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/context.py @@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ from oeqa.sdk.context import OESDKTestContext, OESDKTestContextExecutor class OESDKExtTestContext(OESDKTestContext): esdk_files_dir = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)), "files") + # FIXME - We really need to do better mapping of names here, this at + # least allows some tests to run + def hasHostPackage(self, pkg): + # We force a toolchain to be installed into the eSDK even if its minimal + if pkg.startswith("packagegroup-cross-canadian-"): + return True + return self._hasPackage(self.host_pkg_manifest, pkg) + class OESDKExtTestContextExecutor(OESDKTestContextExecutor): _context_class = OESDKExtTestContext -- 2.7.4 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
