On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Martin Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/03/2017 12:12 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> with meta-clang there is no desire to support multiple versions of >> llvm and thats why versioning was dropped however, I would still like >> to fix the versioning if that makes it more useful. >> > > OK, keeping a single version is certainly simpler. Could you clarify "I > would still like to fix the versioning if that makes it more useful." ? >
say if there are other apps which depend on the versioning and otherwise would need patching to work with llvm from meta-clang, then lets fix it in meta-clang. > I may be missing something, but it seems like the llvm-config wrapper > script's only job is to point to a versioned installed via > WANT_LLVM_RELEASE. If that's the case, and if we don't intend to support > multiple versions, wouldn't it be best simply to remove the wrapper? We > could fix the wrapper instead, but I think that would have to involve > reintroducing versioning. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
