On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-03-03 at 14:58 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Burton, Ross <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 3 March 2017 at 21:39, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > Enabling building the Intel Memory Protection Extension library >> > > > for x86. >> > > > >> > > hope this works on amd chips as well ? >> > >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_MPX >> > >> > It depends on new instructions, so you'll have to ask AMD. :) >> OK if its not so then perhaps a bbappend in meta-intel is more >> appropriate. > > Well, its part of gcc, not something meta-intel is patching in and its > a standard which other arches can implement, maybe in their own library > so I believe the recipe is the better place for this to live. I just > copied the description from the code iirc. >
I think its ok on second thought if its the case where it will be used more often then probably a provision to be able to remove it from a soc layer would be enough > Incidentally, this fails to build on musl so I've just disabled it on > musl for now. > OK > Cheers, > > Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
