On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 17:35 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 11:28 -0600, Mark Hatle wrote: > > > > On 3/8/17 10:57 AM, Ross Burton wrote: > > > > > > > > > Cryptodev is a way for userspace to access the kernel crypto > > > drivers (and so, > > > hardware crypto). > > If the BSP does not support crypto dev, what is the harm in > > this? It > > should fall back to standard behaviors. > Note that the implication here is that openssl depends on the kernel > building and many other pieces of the system depend on openssl so it > does bottleneck the build somewhat. > > It also means a kernel rebuild ends up triggering half the userspace > to rebuild which is annoying for users.
Just to clarify, it doesn't depend on the kernel module, only on a header so it shouldn't be triggering kernel dependencies. I was getting some recipe names confused. I think Ross is going to take another look at this patch... Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
