On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Andre McCurdy <armccu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Andre McCurdy <armccu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Currently native.bbclass clears MACHINEOVERRIDES but leaves
>>> MACHINE_FEATURES alone. Is that an oversight? Or is there ever a
>>> legitimate reason for a native recipe to have a dependency on
>>> MACHINE_FEATURES?
>>
>> MACHINE_FEATURES is specific to target only.
>
> Right, the question is really whether we should try to enforce that or not.
>

we are better off to nullify it for native case. Worth a pull request :)
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to