> Can individual recipes choose to be built using the normal ld? yes, see example in: meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc meta/recipes-support/libunwind/libunwind_git.bb
but it was working with older binutils, so maybe worth tracking down where it got borken. On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 11:14 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:35:23AM +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 09:23 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > > INFO: jenkins-job.sh-1.8.19 Complete log available at > http://logs.nslu2-linux.org/buildlogs/oe/world/pyro/log. > report.20170328_014155.log > > > > > > That used OE-core 552bd78, if I read this right: > > > > > > == Tested changes (not included in master yet) - > openembedded-core == > > > latest upstream commit: > > > 552bd78 wic: use kernel_dir to find systemd-efi bootloader > > > > > > > * openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/ovmf/ovmf_git.bb: > do_compile > > > > > > http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/135202/ > > > > > > "gcc-ar: not found" - that should have been fixed by OE-core 23a12d87a6 > > > "fix toolchain selection", which is included in OE-core 552bd78 and > thus > > > should have been included in the build. > > > > > > However, the error above was "Submitted on: 11/03/17 10:13", which was > a > > > while ago and in particular before that fix. > > > > > > Did ovmf really fail in the latest world build? > > > > The report shows: > > http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Build/34933/ > > which leads to: > > > > http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/138261/ > > Submitted on: 27/03/17 05:31 > > Got it. I followed the wrong link at some point. > > > So yes it failed again, but this time with different error: > > TOPDIR/tmp-glibc/work/i586-oe-linux/ovmf/git-r0/recipe- > sysroot-native/usr/bin/i586-oe-linux/../../libexec/i586- > oe-linux/gcc/i586-oe-linux/6.3.0/ld: > > internal error in do_layout, at ../../gold/object.cc:1821 > > Hmm, internal error in gold. Not sure what to do about that :-/ > > Can individual recipes choose to be built using the normal ld? > > -- > Best Regards, Patrick Ohly > > The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although > I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way > represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak > on behalf of Intel on this matter. > > > >
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core