On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 12:45 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 30 March 2017 at 07:39, > <[email protected]> wrote: > + # recipe-runtime-package relation for virtual/libc > provider > + Libc = collections.namedtuple('Libc', ['recipe', > 'runtime_pkg', 'libpath', 'staticdev', 'utils', 'rutils']) > + cls.libc = Libc('glibc', 'libc6', '/lib/libc.so.6', > 'libc6-staticdev', 'glibc-utils', 'lib6-utils') > + if get_bb_var('TCLIBC') == 'musl': > + cls.libc = Libc('musl', 'musl', > '/usr/lib/libc.so', 'musl-staticdev', None, None) > > > Instead of all of this, why not just change the tests to use a > different package? The bulk of them were just using glibc as it's > going to be built, but we've built zlib too so the tests could use > that instead.
If you consider that replacing the libc for another recipe/package is fine, I go that way. Leo > > > Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
