On 04/14/2017 04:10 PM, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
I'm afraid I can't take these since these scripts get written into the
sstate objects for the recipes in question and this would make the
sstate change depending on the parameters you call bitbake with. I
think we'd both agree that is undesirable.
Bother. Did not think of that (I am so used to having it enabled in all my
builds).
Not sure what we can do but this needs more thought.
Yeah, it would be great if the output from the postinst scripts was actually
captured. But we can think of that for 2.4.
Are you using rpm? If you are, we already have ROOTFS_RPM_DEBUG variable
which, if enabled, directs rpm to output a lot more to the log.do_rootfs
than it normally would. Can you switch it on in your local.conf and see
if you get what you need?
If the log still isn't verbose enough, please write a comment to this bug:
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11096
explaining what kind of output from rpm would be useful to have, and we
can patch rpm to do that.
Alex
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core