On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:57 AM, André Draszik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 18:58 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> Use memset() API instead of __bzero()
>> Drop the patch removing des_* functions for musl
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  .../0001-replace-__bzero-with-memset-API.patch     |  28 +++++
>>  .../libtirpc/remove-des-functionality.patch        | 139 ----------------
>> -----
>>  meta/recipes-extended/libtirpc/libtirpc_1.0.1.bb   |   5 +-
>>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/libtirpc/libtirpc/0001-replace-
>> __bzero-with-memset-API.patch
>>  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/libtirpc/libtirpc/remove-des-
>> functionality.patch
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>
>>  SRC_URI_append_libc-uclibc = " file://remove-des-functionality.patch \
>
> This patch is being removed with this change, and so uclibc builds will
> fail.

yes I know. one should move it to bbappend in own layer if using uclibc.

 Is it time to remove all remaining references to uclibc?

Probably.

>
> Cheers,
> Andre'
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to