I am not familiar with the organization of the various recipes. I mentioned oe-core since the original message was posted there. Meta-oe seems more suitable indeed.
How much work would it be to make a recipe for this? I need it for a short-term project and am not in a position to further support it afterwards. If this is unfeasible I'll look into alternative libraries. All the best, Koenraad On 20 April 2017 at 15:24, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 14:25 +0200, Koenraad Verheyden wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> I want to use PulseAudio with WebRTC echo cancellation. Enabling this >> depends on the webrtc-audio-processing library [1]. >> In an earlier message to this list [2] it was decided to add the >> configuration option to the pulseaudio recipe, although the >> webrtc-audio-processing package isn't implemented yet in OE-core >> >> Is there any progress on this? > > I don't think anyone has been working on it. > > You mentioned adding webrtc-audio-processing to oe-core, but to me > meta-oe would seem like a more natural place for the recipe, because > it's not a hard dependency of anything in oe-core. > > -- > Tanu > > https://www.patreon.com/tanuk -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core