On 11 May 2017 at 23:28, Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote: > As of having an alternative for other potential users - there's nothing > wrong > with it. But, acceptance criteria into OE-Core is quite high, especially > when > there are alternative solutions already available. That's why I'm asking if > it's any better than the other solution. In other words, why libgpiod > should > be accepted to OE-Core, but not libsoc? Maybe it should be submitted to > meta-openembedded layer instead? >
Agreed, the barrier for oe-core is high on purpose and I don't think this is general purpose enough. meta-oe is a perfect fit though. Ross
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
