From: Kai Kang <[email protected]> Having 'lsof' as a +s (setuid) binary could lead to security issues if a compromise in the binary is found. It is better that it be -s by default as a precaution.
Signed-off-by: Kai Kang <[email protected]> --- meta/recipes-extended/lsof/lsof_4.89.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/lsof/lsof_4.89.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/lsof/lsof_4.89.bb index b732cf0..650b34c 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-extended/lsof/lsof_4.89.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/lsof/lsof_4.89.bb @@ -53,6 +53,6 @@ do_compile () { do_install () { install -d ${D}${sbindir} ${D}${mandir}/man8 - install -m 4755 lsof ${D}${sbindir}/lsof + install -m 0755 lsof ${D}${sbindir}/lsof install -m 0644 lsof.8 ${D}${mandir}/man8/lsof.8 } -- 2.10.1 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
