On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 13:16 +0000, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: > > My feelings are: > > > > * We need to use a prefix. We've been burnt too many times in the past > > when not using these. "df-" is fine, users will just have to deal > > with it.
Fine with me. > > * We should filter the list of overrides to those which the distro > > wants to nominate. I really don't want to encourage wider spread of > > things than we need to, these need to be conscious decisions. > > Isn't there a risk that will be confusing? I.e., recipes that use, e.g., > bb.utils.contains() to check if a distro feature is set will be affected > as soon as the feature is added to DISTRO_FEATURES, but recipes that > use the override will only be affected if the feature has also been > added to some filter variable. I'm not sure. I guess it boils down to proper documentation. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
