Hi Khem, can we use ?= for SKIP_RECIPE? I was asked to do that before, because it makes it easier to un-skip it locally (hopefully when someone is preparing the fix for you to merge). e.g. https://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=96a92761c0a1bb2317fa4ea422c32e4473405103 https://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=d7f5367b53f6fd410e1ebb270f52c2d9f4b3435a
All current SKIP_RECIPE except vlc are using ?=. Thanks On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 5:46 AM Khem Raj via lists.openembedded.org <[email protected]> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> > --- > meta-oe/recipes-support/cpp-netlib/cpp-netlib_git.bb | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/cpp-netlib/cpp-netlib_git.bb > b/meta-oe/recipes-support/cpp-netlib/cpp-netlib_git.bb > index bda5177fc4..3cf166bd4a 100644 > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-support/cpp-netlib/cpp-netlib_git.bb > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-support/cpp-netlib/cpp-netlib_git.bb > @@ -28,3 +28,5 @@ do_install:append() { > sed -i -e 's|${RECIPE_SYSROOT}||g' > ${D}${libdir}/cmake/cppnetlib/cppnetlibConfig.cmake > sed -i -e 's|${RECIPE_SYSROOT}||g' > ${D}${libdir}/cmake/cppnetlib/cppnetlibTargets-noconfig.cmake > } > + > +SKIP_RECIPE[cpp-netlib] = "Does not work with boost >= 1.87" > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#114827): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/114827 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/110582198/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
