On Tuesday 23 June 2009 19:46:54 Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:30 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > -frename-registers was a workaround to get past a ARM GCC ICE in 4.2 > > IIRC we should get rid of it. > > No, -frename-registers is an optimisation in its own right. I think we > probably want to keep that. You might be thinking of the > -fno-rename-registers that we do use for some packages to avoid an ice > on arm with gcc 3.4. > > > -fexpensive-optimizations and -fomit-frame-pointer are passed by > > default at O2 so we should get rid of them too. > > Is that true on all targets? I didn't think that -O2 implied > -fomit-frame-pointer on arm.
>From my testing on recent gcc... it is turned on by default. z. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
