+1 Please go ahead and drop it :-)
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:11 AM, GNUtoo <[email protected]> wrote: > hi, Tom Rin said: > "To follow up to myself, the 'mdev' package should just go away really. > This particular bug is because 'mdev' has an empty mdev.conf while > busybox's mdev does not, and it contains console/null/etc entries." > in "Re: [oe] [PATCH] mdev: mdev.sh: permit serial console login and > correct init runlevel" > ( http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/25296 ) > So should we remove mdev recipe and use busybox's mdev instead...if so > all the recipe/distro that were using it must be updated. > for intance the micro-base-image use it: > IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER = "mdev" > that should be replaced by: > IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER = "busybox-mdev" > A quick grep for IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER in the dev branch shows that only the > micro-base-image use it... > > Does someone have an objection(for the mdev recipe removal)? > > By the way i sent that mail because there could have things that I > didn't thought,people that could depend on .dev but use external > recipes(I was thinking of thing like MokoMakefiles),or issues with other > branches,But also because I was told to do so. > > Denis. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
