On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:42 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 21.10.2009, 13:21 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi: > > If we continue down the sane-srcrevs.inc route we should consider moving > > PV_pn into there as well. Having SRCREV and PN in 2 different places > > only adds confusion and leads to misversions. > > Correct. > > > Speaking of misversioning, I should really go through all scm fetched > > packages I use and verify PV is correct for those. > > Agreed, will have to do the same here.
Can I also suggest we start using SRCPV in PV, not SRCREV? This removed the need to play a lot of games with PV... (Poky has switched to this now) Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
