2009/10/26 Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]>: > 2009/10/26 Koen Kooi <[email protected]>: >> On 26-10-09 16:37, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> While creating a recipe which generates a module I bumped into the >>> following issue. >>> If I do >>> inherit module >>> the package name uses MACHINE_KERNEL_PR and not PR. >>> I understand the reason for this: if the kernel is modified you want >>> the proper modules. >>> However in a recipe this means that if the recipe changes for whatever >>> reason that technically one should increase all MACHINE_KERNEL_PR >>> values (as otherwise the new version is not used). >>> In my eyes this is not very desirable. >>> >>> Any opinions how we should fix this? >> >> k...@dominion:/OE/org.openembedded.dev$ grep PR_append recipes/ti/* >> recipes/ti/ti-cmem-module_2.24.01.bb:MACHINE_KERNEL_PR_append = "a" >> recipes/ti/ti-dm355mm-module_1.13.bb:MACHINE_KERNEL_PR_append = "a" >> recipes/ti/ti-dmai_svn.bb:MACHINE_KERNEL_PR_append = "c" >> recipes/ti/ti-dsplink-module_1.61.3.bb:MACHINE_KERNEL_PR_append = "a" >> recipes/ti/ti-lpm-module_2.24.01.bb:MACHINE_KERNEL_PR_append = "a" >> recipes/ti/ti-sdma-module_2.24.01.bb:MACHINE_KERNEL_PR_append = "a" > > Ah, ok didn't know about that one and when coined this on #oe no-one > mentioned this solution. > Thanks alot! Frans >
Two more things: We have about 83 recipes that do inherit module. and 12 that have MACHINE_KERNEL_PR (10 ti ones, linux omap pm and open-iscsi which I just added) so ti seems 71 have a problem and why not change the class and add _$(PR) or so instead of _append ? Frans _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
