Forwarded conversation
Subject: 2.6.31 won't boot from nand (c7x0 and tosa)
------------------------

From: *Andrea Adami* <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:52 AM
To: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <[email protected]>, Stanislav Brabec <
[email protected]>, [email protected], - Cortez - <[email protected]>, Yuri
Bushmelev <[email protected]>


Hello,

I spent some hours compiling various *vanilla* flavours of 2.6.31 for
c7x0, up to 2.6.31.3.
The kernel boots just fine from SD/CF using kexec(boot) but hangs
immediately if launched from nand.

I double-checked the .config and I'm sure I've had the same mtd
options as in 2.6, so it should just boot...
Last lines on console are from bootloader: *** Jumping to Linux ***
and then nothing...no leds activity nor reboot after flash.

What's interesting is that Tosa too doesn't boot from nand with this
kernel, so possibly is the same issue.
Any idea, any floating patch?

Regards

Andrea

----------
From: *Pavel Machek* <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:58 AM
To: Andrea Adami <[email protected]>


I'm using kexec, exclusively :-(.
                                                                       Pavel
--
(english) 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek<http://www.livejournal.com/%7Epavelmachek>
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html<http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/%7Epavel/picture/horses/blog.html>

----------
From: *- Cortez -* <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:23 AM
To: Andrea Adami <[email protected]>


Hi Andrea,

I had no time to look into this yesterday, but browsing through the mailing
list I find:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg75900.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg75829.html

I hope one of these help ;-)

Cheers,
cortez



----------
From: *Stanislav Brabec* <[email protected]>
Date: 2009/10/26
To: Andrea Adami <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <[email protected]>, [email protected], - Cortez -
<[email protected]>, Yuri Bushmelev <[email protected]>


Few days ago I sent a patch called "Zaurus: Fix NAND Flash OOB layout
for Borzoi". Maybe something similar affects Tosa. However quick look
into the code does not show any apparent problem.

Old implementation: Only driver in drivers/mtd/nand/sharpsl.c.

New implementation: Platform definition + drivers/mtd/nand/sharpsl.c.

In my case it attempted to boot, but I seen lots of NAND errors on the
beginning of the boot.

--
Stanislav Brabec
http://www.penguin.cz/~utx/zaurus <http://www.penguin.cz/%7Eutx/zaurus>


----------
From: *Andrea Adami* <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:09 PM
To: Stanislav Brabec <[email protected]>


Not here on c7x0, if I copy the kexecboot-kernel on SD/CF and boot
from there it seems to find and respect the mtd partitions...

I personally did not test on tosa: Yuri said tosa boots with 2.6.30
but not 2.6.31.
I'll have to try with 2.6.30 on c7x0 too.

Regards

Andrea

----------
From: *Yuri Bushmelev* <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:33 PM
To: Andrea Adami <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <[email protected]>, Stanislav Brabec <
[email protected]>, [email protected], - Cortez - <[email protected]>


I've tested .31 on tosa some time ago. Kernel booting just hangs in the
middle.

BTW, what about create some group on google or project on linuxtogo to
connect all active zaurus users and developers. We are still have some
unresolved troubles (power management for clamshells, wifi for tosa). IMHO,
it would be great thing for collaboration.

--
Yuri Bushmelev

----------
From: *Stanislav Brabec* <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:21 PM
To: Yuri Bushmelev <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrea Adami <[email protected]>, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <
[email protected]>, [email protected], - Cortez - <[email protected]>


It may be an useful idea. Especially if there will be any way to contact
other people that may be able to test patch on other devices.

Do you think that it makes sense to create a git tree for Zaurus
(probably based on Eric's tree + Eric's fix tree) and then push tested
stuff? (Well, I am not yet so familiar with git.)

I am thinking about yet another project: Matchbox2. The original site is
dead, maintainers don't respond and I push each fix as a patch directly
to OE. It already works nicely on my Zaurus.

Private note:
People at Trisoft were so kind and provided service documentation and
schematic for Zauruses. They were originally under NDA, but if anybody
of you would consider it as useful, I can provide them.

And here is my data sheet mirror:
http://www.penguin.cz/~utx/zaurus/datasheets/<http://www.penguin.cz/%7Eutx/zaurus/datasheets/>


________________________________________________________________________
Stanislav Brabec
http://www.penguin.cz/~utx <http://www.penguin.cz/%7Eutx>, ICQ 116020046,
xmpp:[email protected] <xmpp%[email protected]>


----------
From: *Pavel Machek* <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:44 PM
To: Stanislav Brabec <[email protected]>
Cc: Yuri Bushmelev <[email protected]>, Andrea Adami <
[email protected]>, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <[email protected]>, -
Cortez - <[email protected]>


Yes, something like that would be cool.
Well, if the ammount of outstanding patches gets big and if someone is
willing to maintain it, why not, but for now, I guess using Eric's
tree makes sense.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to