Just noticed this commit:
commit 04bf7d5d151173ac058f4aff2e4be3ae0f98216e
Author: Marcin Juszkiewicz <mar...@juszkiewicz.com.pl>
Date: Fri Oct 30 11:38:49 2009 +0100
u-boot: added Sheevaplug support
Marvell devices needs u-boot.kwb instead of u-boot.bin due to header for
first stage bootloader. UBOOT_BINARY variable was introduced due of
that.
Any particular reason not to call it u-boot.bin? I know the first
stage bootloader needs to be prefixed but as this is device specific
and ends up in the sheeva dirs only, I see no need for a name change
(but feel free to enlighten me).
BTW: is there already also work being done for openrd u-boot?
Frans
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
