On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: >> - file://mono-cross-compilation-for-amd64.patch;patch=1 \ >> +# file://mono-cross-compilation-for-amd64.patch;patch=1 \ > > That patch (mono-cross-compilation-for-amd64) does look pretty bogus. > The file header says: > > "This is a workaround for bug 515050 > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515050#c2 > > Real fix is something else which did not make into 2.4.2 > http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-patches/2009-June/151386.html > http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-patches/2009-June/151387.html > > but we are ok with workaround its safe."
that was the remarks from the threads which discussed the above bug. I forgot to include the complete reference. I was merely going by the comments in the thread. cbrake had a locally disable this patch and tested but did not yet commit it. > > ... but it's hard to see how forcing MONO_ARCH_SUPPORT_SIMD_INTRINSICS > unconditionally really counts as "safe": this seems almost certain to > break on any target that doesn't actually have that support. If this > patch were moved to SRC_URI_append_amd64 then it'd probably be ok, but > the patches from those other two URLs look like a better solution. > > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
