On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 07:53:22AM +0100, Petr ?tetiar wrote: > Holger Hans Peter Freyther <[email protected]> [2009-11-02 03:09:56]: > > > On Sunday 01 November 2009 23:59:18 Andrea Adami wrote: > > > And what about having a checksum file in each dir of /recipes ? > > > If the checksum changes the PR should be changed too. > > > > > > I think that is the best way in terms of scalability and BB collections. We > > have some weird cases where we might do require ../ but these are broken or > > need to duplicate the checksums... > > I like this idea more than one monolitic checksum file. checksums.ini is place > for storing of a duplicate information anyway. You need to enter URL in > checksums, > you need to enter URL again into recipe. > > Wouldn't it be better to write URL with checksum once at one place and reuse > it than in recipe as some kind of variable or something like that?
It was discussed during OEDEM and the conclusion was to switch to using checksums in SRC_URIs of corresponding recipes. -- Denys _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
