2009/11/11 Phil Blundell <[email protected]>: > On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 17:01 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> 2009/11/11 Phil Blundell <[email protected]>: >> > On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 14:17 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: >> >> SCR_URI = "xyz://abc.com/efg.tgz;name=bar" >> >> >> >> MD5SUM_bar = "" >> >> >> >> or maybe : >> >> >> >> MD5SUM[bar] = "" >> > >> > The labelling is a good idea, although I am not especially keen on >> > either of those notations. How about: >> > >> > SRC_URI = "xyz://abc.com/efg.tgz;name=bar" >> > SRC_URI[md5sum:bar] = "..." >> > SRC_URI[sha256sum:bar] = "..." >> > >> Would we still be able to use PN and PV in the md5sum:bar etc? > > Not directly, though it isn't entirely obvious to me why this would be a > useful thing to do. Did you have a situation in mind where this would > be desirable? > I am somewhat lazy so if a new version of a recipe has to be made I'd like to touch as little as possible. (the less I have to do the less chance of an error occurring) So preferably I would use PV an PN in the url and not copy it from somewhere (as that is more error prone too.
(btw I can also envision a new bitbake task which will rewrite the checksums). Frans _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
