2009/11/22 Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com>: > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:51:52AM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> I'm flabbergasted. >> >> The link Philip provided suggests this is a bug fix, but Martin does >> not find any differences ???? > > I haven't found any notice about SDL_mixer on that news link (only > SDL_image-1.2.9), > > Refreshed date on sources, can be sort of bug fix even without actuall > source change, ie if Makefile don't want to regenerate some file, > because its newer than its "source", but haven't checked if that's the > case.
Hm. That would put things in loser++ mode. If files are generated by the makefile they do not belong in the archive ... Then again the website says: * Fixed alpha premultiplication on Mac OS X and iPhone OS * Fixed checking for IMG_Init() return value in image loaders But I agree with Koen, let's move to 1.2.11. FM > > If someone want's recheck old source and cannot find it, I put it here > http://jama.mk.cvut.cz/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz > >> Also this does not fix the problem that people will have wrong files >> in their downloads dir. > > No idea how to fix this, but for me, if it says I have wrong checksum, > first thing I do is remove local file + check if checksums.ini changed > (hopefully with some ACK or at least by some respectfull commiter) > >> Frans (who thingks the package upstream name should have been changed >> after making the patch). > > No doubt about it > > -- > uin:136542059 jid:martin.ja...@gmail.com > Jansa Martin sip:jama...@voip.wengo.fr > JaMa > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel