On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 20:49 +0000, Jeremy Williams wrote:
> Looking into the first issue reveals something puzzling to me. If you look at
> gcc-package-target.inc, the do_install operation creates a .so symlink to
> libgcc. Looking at the FILES definition for the gcc package (non -dev), it
> appears that this symlink is being sucked into the package by the entry
> "${gcclibdir}/${TARGET_SYS}/${BINV}/lib*". Am I confused here?I think you're probably right, and the QA test is just wrong/unhelpful in this situation. Having the .so symlink in the gcc package is the correct thing to do: it would be silly to force everybody to install an extra gcc-dev package in order to get it. p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
